What’s Wrong With Modern Dance?

Upcoming Cal Performances dates bode well for the current state of dance and filling big venues.


Published:

Mark Morris’ L’Allegro

by David Leyes, courtesy of Cal Performances

(page 1 of 2)

One more too-long ballet brings time to a standstill. Gratuitous, quasi-violent encounters between human bodies or between dancers and gravity during a modern dance piece elicit yawns instead of reflection on mortality, fate, or danger. People who haven’t spent most of their lifetime steeped in dance may ask a dancer buddy/expert: Is dance doomed? Specifically, is classical ballet able to relevé—rise up on its toes—but no longer relevant? Has contemporary dance reached a crisis by reaching out to mainstream audiences? (Think: So You Think You Can Dance.)

All of which became urgent in early 2016, when this ruminating, waiting-for-a-dance-to-end writer encountered Cal Performances’ season catalogue amid the detritus of holiday wrapping paper and too many Nutcrackers.

The March/April calendar was most intriguing. Within a 24-day window: Mark Morris’ 1988 masterpiece, L’Allegro, il Penseroso ed il Moderato; choreographer Trajal Harrell’s The Ghost of Montpellier Meets the Samurai; Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater bringing three programs that include Ailey’s earthy, muscular Revelations; ballets by Robert Battle, the 58-year-old company’s third artistic director, and other works. (This springtime focus leapfrogs over January’s Cloud Gate Dance Theatre of Taiwan’s Rice and Chitresh Das Dance Company with Shiva in late February.)

The Morris work puts the choreographer’s distinctive American blush on Handel’s pastoral baroque-era opera that is based on two poems by Milton. Harrell perplexes and stimulates audiences—often with vogue-laced investigations of American historical or cultural issues and time periods, but in Berkeley his postmodern slant will angle East to Japanese dance theater’s Butoh. The Ailey company is civil rights in a time capsule—offering profundity from the cornerstone Revelations to fresh-off-the-rack West Coast premieres by some of the 21st century’s most original African-American voices.

 

 

Are the March offerings a celebratory feast and revival, or a sign that presenters must step out on a limb and grab at cultural and historical diversity to counter the dullness of dance and attract an audience? With 22 years in the field as a ballet master, setting and rehearsing dances for professional companies, I found dance in such a crisis a disturbing idea.

If you’re not a dancer … well, forget that idea, because everyone is a dancer. We all dance as children. Not only that, we once couldn’t help but dance. Childhood wiggles and wildness are an exuberant ballet that usually ends when an adult scoffs, a peer mocks, or a kid gets stuffed into tights and his or her inner light goes out. Occasionally, the glow continues, and a dancer is in the making. But we all dance before falling into commerce, law, medicine, computer science, or some other industry.

So is the art form losing ground?

Except for Nutcracker, there are few “sure things” in dance. Presenters hoping to fill large venues like Berkeley’s Zellerbach Hall or San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Center for the Arts have to hit a target by appealing to everyone from fanatics to fringe hangers-on. Or do they? And what alchemy attracts a crowd?

Cal Performances Associate Director Rob Bailis says commitments to the life cycle of Mark Morris, Ailey, and other companies including NDT and Mariinsky Ballet and Orchestra have allowed an informed, invested audience to develop. “The more fluent an audience becomes in the body of work of an artist over time, the more likely they are to accept the natural variations that occur,” Bailis said. “Given the opportunity and the incentive, they will seek context for the artist whose works they know well in the company of other works by other artists they know less well.”

Unpacking this idea, Bailis is calling up a noteworthy point: Most people see a dance only one time. It has to bite them in the ass, tickle their sense of humor, make them cry, rage, or more. It’s OK to leave an audience perplexed, but a choreographer must leave them hungry for more—or presenters suffer the slow death of a half-filled theater.

If you’re old enough to have experienced dance’s 1970-’80s heyday, when regional companies sprouted like proverbial weeds nationwide and big companies built themselves up in New York City and San Francisco, you can wonder what happened between then and now. Today, many companies are known as “pick up,” with dancers hired for specific gigs, not whole seasons—and frequently not paid for rehearsals at all.

“People built companies; Dance on Tour gave companies opportunities; federal support was profound,” said John Killacky, executive director of Flynn Center for the Performing Arts in Burlington, Vt. “The dance field professionalized itself in the ’70s and ’80s.”

Add your comment:
Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags

Big savings on local dining & more.

Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags
Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags Edit ModuleShow Tags